Saturday, April 28, 2007

Interview with Susie Orbach

There are few women out there who can honestly say that they have never, at some point in their lives, had a problem with their bodies. It might have been as little as having a slight annoyance with the curve of your thighs or as extreme as an eating disorder. Negative body image is something that women live with throughout their lives - and the cycle never ceases. We overhear our mothers talking about it and then move on to discussing our own bodies with our friends.


While we may all be familiar with the notion of body image, in 1978 when psychotherapist and writer Dr.Susie Orbach wrote ‘Fat Is A Feminist Issue’ the relationship between self worth and body image, especially in women, was new and controversial. Today she is one of the founders of AnyBody. She co-founded The Women's Therapy Centre in London in The Women's Therapy Centre Institute in New York. She has also been a consultant to The World Bank and at the moment is a consultant to the NHS and Dove, taking part in the Real Beauty Campaign.


More and more we hear discussion about government being responsible for the obesity problems facing the Western World, but what about the other side of the spectrum? Is someone responsible for the high rate of eating disorders causing young women to starve themselves? The fashion industry? The media?


Figure: Why did you start AnyBody?


Susie Orbach: Why did we start it! Because the assault on women’s bodies is so unrelenting and yet is experienced by girls and women as ‘normal’ as just part of femininity. We wanted to make an intervention that highlighted and addressed the way in which the female body (and increasingly the male body) is a site for extraordinary difficulty. We want to transform those conditions and make it possible for girls and women to live from their bodies with a certain ease rather than the fear that can engulf them.


F: AnyBody engages with government to change cultural perception of beauty and women’s bodies. Why the focus on government engagement as opposed to other forms of activism?


SO: There isn’t a focus on government. That is just one of the pressure points. We engage with government to make a contribution where it can to changing the situation. So far we haven’t been that successful!


F: Most recently AnyBody protested at London Fashion Week about the organizer's decision not to ban size 0 models from the catwalk. What was the public response? How did the organizers react to the demonstration?


SO: We were delighted that we could raise issues that went beyond Size O, that our ideas were broadcast widely and that we could engage with the British Fashion Council to urge them to bring the creativity of the fashion industry to transforming the mono imagery and body fascism that now surrounds the presentation of fashion. Have we got far yet? No. But an AnyBody member is putting together a show displaying diversity at Toronto Fashion Week (see www.any-body.org)


F: The media industry's standard comeback for criticisms like your own about body image is that they publish what people want to see, and if people wanted to see more realistic figures, then they would, in turn, shift their focus. Others say that the media manufactures our perception of body image. Where do you weigh in on this "chicken or the egg" argument?


SO: Once you have a dominant and dominating image, then people will look out for it and even take a kind of comfort in it. Fashion is associated with the modern and being at the leading edge of design and once a style or a size has been identified people recognise it and want to embody it themselves. So it is that our eyes become accustomed to seeing images in particular ways and as an expression of our own enthusiasms and energies we want to see them and reproduce them.


F: AnyBody is aiming to bring a case against Weight Watchers as an example of exploitation of ‘the aesthetic ideal of slenderness’. Can you tell me more about what you hope to accomplish with this case?


SO: The diet industry needs to be put on notice. Its methods don’t work for most people. 97% of them. That’s the recidivism rate. That’s what they rely on for their profit. They need repeat customers.


Secondly, for many people, dieting and particularly repetitive dieting, mucks up your metabolism by reducing your set point. This means that your metabolism can slow down when you eat less. No help if you are dieting.


So the diet industry needs to be scrutinized against the Trade Descriptions Act and other consumer legislation.


F: You are a contributing expert and board member of the Dove Self-Esteem Fund, part of Dove’s Campaign for Real Beauty. The campaign has been quite controversial: some hailing it as a revolutionary step for more ethical advertising and others seeing it as just another clever marketing gimmick. Critiques have noted that while Dove may be using more realistically shaped women in their ads, they are still selling products (such as thigh firming cream) that target women’s self-esteem. How do you respond to such concerns?


SO: That criticism is valid. They should be promoting the diversity of beauty not firming creams.


F: As part of Dove's Campaign for Real Beauty, they have helped engage consumers for donations to the Self-Esteem Fund, which in turn makes grants to organizations like the Girl Scouts (in the US) to provide their members with curriculum and activities that promote a healthy body image. How important was this piece of the campaign for you? Were you involved in this philanthropic effort at all? Do you feel like having a piece that reaches out to young girls is critical to the mission of the campaign, or perhaps unnecessary?


SO: There is the behind the scenes global studies I have done with Nancy Etcoff: one on Beauty in general, one on mothers and daughters and one on women over 50. Then there is the consciousness raising inside the company to get them to take up the ideas which then lead to different advertising. That is one set of activities I have been involved in. The other is working with other groups such as Girl Guides or the BEAT to produce material for use in schools – it is not a question of just giving them money - which focuses on body self esteem and media literacy, and preparing materials for Mums to help them with their daughter’s concerns.


F: Finally, what do we need to break the cycle of young girls falling into the same beauty myths that they always have?


SO: We need to help new Mums not pass on their difficult body image issues along with their milk. We don’t want them mimicking their mother’s upset about size, weight and shape and thinking that that is essential to being female.


We need to broaden the images girls see so that they can identify themselves in the world of images that they live in. We need to stop the crazy anguish around food so that it becomes something not dangerous and naughty but related to appetite and satisfaction. We can help young girls by eating like that in front of them instead of avoiding different foods and obsessing about our own size.

Wednesday, April 25, 2007

HOLLABACK!!!

I've posted before about Hollaback, the phenomenal nonprofit started by my good friend Emily to help women deal with street harassment. She started in New York and it's blowing up worldwide. Check out this short and awesome video about the organization, and learn more about them at Hollaback NYC.

Sunday, April 22, 2007

French Presidential Elections

Today is voting day for the first round of elections in France. I should be voting but I'm registered at the French Embassy in London, so I'll have to miss out. There are four leading candidates, but really three. Le Pen is counted in the top four but he is always counted in the top four because there will always be enough racists in the world to keep men like Le Pen up there, pretending to be a real candidate.

But for me the most interesting candidate is the socialist Segolene Royal. She runs the region Poitou-Charente where I am living at the moment. I didn't actually realize this until this morning, I have been too consumed with house renovation to look up and find out about local politics. But today I can't ignore it. She has been testing out her policies in this area, namely focusing on employment but so far has not been doing so well, according to her critics. Royal is a strong socialist and socialism is not what France needs at the moment.

It's unfortunate that the first real potential runner up for a female French president may not be that good after all. She does not offer the potential to drag France into the 21st century, but offers 'a fairer France'. I think France is fair enough as it is. You may here a tinge of capitalism creeping in here and that's because it's there. Poitou-Charente at times feels like a communist country. I drive through the country side and I don't recognize the France that I knew as a child. I don't want the rest of France to look like Poitou-Charente but I also don't want the rest of France to stay in it's current state.

Royal has attempted to seperate herself in some ways from the old boys of politics. When reading her campaign material you don't feel that she is simply a good spokeswoman, picked by the leader of the socialist party for pretty, PC window dressing. And the way that she sued her father for divorce after he wouldn't grant it to her mother shows that she has a spark to fight that is necessary for surviving in politics.

Royal has called out the women of France to vote for her, to help make history by putting a woman in office. But much like the problem with Hilary, being a woman isn't a good enough reason, even though most of us have been waiting years for this to happen.

Wednesday, April 18, 2007

New Evidence on use of Comfort Women

Visit the Associated Press article about new evidence discovered by historians about the use of comfort women in Japan in the 30s and 40s. Apparenlty the Japanese goverment is trying to sneak out of their original apology in 1993...